Space debris problem is growing exponentially worse, now threatens working satellites

Thousands of satellites circle our planet to watch weather patterns, connect remote communities, and power navigation apps. Their orbits are crammed with space debris – discarded boosters and scattered scraps from past missions – creating hazards that never seemed so urgent.

These observations come from Emma Stevenson of the European Space Agency’s Space Debris Office, who has helped compile data on how unused satellites, leftover rocket hardware, and countless fragments endanger active missions.

She and her colleagues monitor the constant traffic in low-Earth orbit and beyond, noting patterns of debris that threaten our future in space.

Understanding space debris – the basics

Space debris is basically the junkyard we’ve created in orbit – old satellites, broken rocket parts, and tiny shards from past collisions just floating around the Earth at insane speeds.

Every piece, no matter how small, has the potential to do serious damage. Think about it: a paint chip moving at 17,000 miles per hour can punch a hole in a spacecraft.

The International Space Station constantly tracks this stuff and occasionally has to dodge it. It’s like trying to drive through traffic while avoiding a swarm of invisible, hypersonic marbles.

If we don’t get a handle on the mess, things could get way worse. Scientists worry about something called the Kessler Syndrome – a scenario where one collision creates more debris, which causes more collisions, and so on until space becomes a giant, deadly pinball machine.

If that happens, launching satellites (or even astronauts) could become too dangerous, and we’d lose access to GPS, weather data, and a ton of modern communication systems we rely on every day.

Space debris far outnumbers satellites

These new figures show that more than 40,000 tracked objects surround Earth, yet fewer than a third are working spacecraft. Because of growing debris, cleanup is necessary.

Even without any additional launches, the number of space debris would keep growing, because fragmentation events add new debris objects faster than debris can naturally re-enter the atmosphere, said Stevenson. 

Experts refer to this self-sustaining collision cycle as the Kessler syndrome, a phenomenon first described in the 1970s. It can render certain orbits too dangerous for new satellites and even jeopardize human spaceflight routes. 

Major fragmentation events

Fragments mostly come from sudden breakups caused by leftover fuel, battery explosions, or even deliberate tests.

Several severe incidents happened in the last year involving SpaceX Starship test flights. Each incident unleashed hundreds of sharp-edged pieces traveling at thousands of miles per hour.

These collisions risk hitting active satellites and can multiply the junk field with each crash. Operators constantly check for close approaches.

However, this proves to be a more difficult process due to new satellites that sometimes outnumber the debris in certain orbits.

Shorter orbits, rising re-entries

Improved compliance with debris guidelines has pushed many satellites into lower routes. Their orbits decay more quickly, which speeds up atmospheric re-entry and cuts the time they spend circling our planet.

This trend explains why intact objects now drop out of orbit. In fact, space debris drops out of orbit three times a day on average.

Although many re-enter safely, bigger spacecraft can leave hazardous remnants that reach land or sea, creating pollution in the process. 

Cutting space debris to protect satellites

Organizations worldwide are updating debris rules to clear satellites and rocket stages much sooner than the previous 25-year limit.

Some now target five years or less to lessen the debris load and curb catastrophic collisions.

The push includes direct retrieval of massive dead satellites and used rocket segments. Active removal missions are in development, and operators aim to design future spacecraft with better passivation systems.

This will decrease explosions in orbit and reduce the harmful amount of space debris.

Satellites vs. junk: The new traffic jam

The most active region for satellites sits between 300 and 700 miles above Earth, where the density of functioning spacecraft is now rivaled by debris.

ESA’s MASTER tool revealed that in these crowded bands, the number of satellite pieces larger than a centimeter – big enough to destroy a satellite – is nearly equal to the number of working payloads.

As satellite constellations grow, with thousands of small units launched together, some orbits resemble high-speed highways with no traffic lights.

Even minor objects, like a screw or paint chip, can hit with explosive force due to orbital speeds of over 17,000 mph.

The cost of ignoring the mess

If current trends continue, simulations show the number of catastrophic collisions could grow dramatically in the coming decades – even without a single new launch.

This would cripple space-based services we rely on for climate monitoring, communications, and disaster response.

ESA’s report emphasizes that active debris removal and stricter global standards are a necessity. If these procedures are not enacted, space could become unusable for future missions.

Stevenson and her team are urging international space agencies and commercial companies alike to commit to coordinated cleanup strategies and enforce tighter post-mission rules to reduce the ever-growing clutter of debris in space.

The study is published in the journal ESA’s Annual Space Environment Report 2025.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–