NASA shows new interest in UFOs and hidden government files

There have been endless whispers about unidentified flying objects. Some people have tried to push these whispers aside, but the recent attention from public agencies, politicians, and scientists is getting harder to ignore.

The topic is no longer just the domain of enthusiasts lurking in chat rooms. Instead, it has tiptoed into the halls of Congress and the offices of well-respected aerospace experts.

A few officials acknowledge confusion, while others say there is a need to be patient and practical.

After the second week of careful examination, the details stack up. There are official inquiries, old photos, radar data, and hushed hallway discussions.

Unexplained shapes appear on military pilots’ screens, then vanish. Lawmakers hold hearings. Eyewitnesses keep coming forward.

Old program, new curiosity

It was not long ago that reports surfaced about a quiet Pentagon endeavor. According to one source, there were funds tucked away in the Defense Department budget that supported something many never thought possible.

“In the $600 billion annual Defense Department budgets, the $22 million spent on the Advanced Aerospace Threat Identification Program was almost impossible to find.” (The New York Times, 12/16/2017).

The idea that a highly organized system might have funded efforts to investigate unusual aerial incidents stirred both amazement and a bit of suspicion.

NASA steps in

The world’s favorite space agency also took a careful look earlier last year claiming, “The NASA independent study team did not find any evidence that UAP have an extraterrestrial origin.” (NASA, 2023).

The search for answers does not mean jumping to wild conclusions. NASA has always tried to separate facts from fantasies.

Its experts run experiments, analyze data, and present findings plainly. One might say NASA’s presence in this debate encourages patience.

At the same time, some inside these circles admit that data quality is uneven. “Some NASA employees have privately raised concerns about the reliability of available data.” (Shellenberger, 2024).

This, from last month’s congressional hearing where Michael Shellenberger submitted over 200 heavily redacted pages to accompany his testimony at the “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena: Exposing the Truth” congressional hearing on November 13th.

Shellenberger asserted: “The United States Department Of Defense and the intelligence community are withholding information about anomalous phenomena from Congress.”

Military voices sound off

Pilots have always been a special breed. They do not scare easily, nor do they tend to share tall tales. That is why first-hand accounts from military pilots ring with an unusual tone.

“I observed an object that accelerated like nothing I have ever seen.” (Fravor, 2023). Such words come from a seasoned individual known for level-headed judgment.

Others point out that current technology is not fully equipped to handle this. “Pilot witnesses are credible and they deserve better data collection tools.” (Ryan, 2023).

A need for open minds

Some see this as a moment to admit that science is never finished. “We must remain open to new data and evidence that challenges our assumptions.” (Gallaudet, 2024).

Skeptics say that looking at odd lights in the sky is a fool’s errand, but others say it is wise to keep an open mind. Scientists know how often knowledge evolves.

Each decade brings tools that let us measure, record, and interpret more accurately than before. This steady change in methods may help settle questions that once seemed impossible to answer.

Strange capabilities

For those who have seen these objects, the standard rules of flight seem to shatter. “These objects demonstrate capabilities that defy our current understanding of aerodynamics.” (Elizondo, 2024).

Aeronautical experts scratch their heads when objects move without visible propulsion. Yet, no one wants to jump to any wild explanations. Cooler heads say that nature is tricky, people misunderstand what they see, and sensors can fail.

Others say it would be careless to shrug off these reports. “Understanding UAP may require new thinking.” (Gold, 2024).

Shifts in approach

No one agency or organization is expected to solve all of this. Different groups contribute what they can.

Policymakers consider guidelines that might encourage transparent reporting. Scientists refine collection methods. Analysts look for patterns in the chaos.

Some voices say a nudge toward serious academic study could help. “We must encourage more rigorous scientific inquiry into UAP.” (Dave G., 2023).

When researchers approach this with calm curiosity, the public may feel less tension. If more data is gathered with proper standards, maybe the mysteries will shrink, or at least be categorized in a sensible way.

A topic that refuses to fade

There are no perfect answers yet. Some find that frustrating. Others sense an opportunity to push knowledge a tiny step forward.

Watching the slow, but steady spotlight on unidentified objects suggests that the truth is not known by any single person.

In time, it might become an ordinary subject instead of a hush-hush conversation. Officials and experts have started asking new questions. That alone is a small shift. One thing is certain: the subject is not going anywhere, anytime soon.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–