Memory mystery: Why we remember some experiences but not others
12-09-2024

Memory mystery: Why we remember some experiences but not others

Memory, a phenomenon that has fascinated scientists and psychologists for generations, remains a puzzle with many unanswered questions.

A recently published review paper provides fresh insights into why certain experiences are retained, and explores the factors that shape what people remember.

Authored by Fernanda Morales-Calva, a graduate student in psychological sciences, and Stephanie Leal, an adjunct assistant professor at Rice University, the review appears in a special issue of the journal Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience.

The researchers investigated the “three Ws” of memory – what, where, and when – while addressing the vital question of why certain experiences become memorable.

Experiences that we remember

The researchers examined existing studies to develop a comprehensive understanding of how emotional significance, personal relevance, and individual differences shape memory retention. They emphasized that memory is deeply subjective.

“Memory is not a one-size-fits-all phenomenon. What’s memorable for one person might be entirely forgettable for another, depending on their unique background and cognitive priorities,” explained Morales-Calva.

The researchers categorized the study into three core domains: what, where, and when we remember.

Emotionally significant events, personally relevant experiences, and focused attention emerged as critical factors shaping recall.

For example, individuals are more likely to remember events that are imbued with emotional resonance or details they consciously focus on.

Moreover, individual circumstances such as cultural, cognitive, and personal differences further highlight the fluidity of how experiences are retained.

“This review highlights the importance of considering subjectivity and context in memory research. By accounting for these variables, we can develop more accurate diagnostic tools and effective interventions,” noted Leal, stressing the importance of this variability.

Spatial memory and timing

The researchers also emphasized the importance of where events occur. The concept of spatial memory, often studied in animals, is highly relevant to human experiences as well.

According to Morales-Calva and Leal, new environments demand more attention and leave stronger imprints on memory compared to routine, familiar settings.

Additionally, the timing – or the when – of an event impacts memory retention. Humans tend to sequence events and recognize transitions, which aids in recall.

“Specific events are often compartmentalized into distinct episodes, making them easier to remember,” the researchers explained.

Clinical implications of the research

The researchers highlighted the critical implications of their findings for clinical and real-world applications, emphasizing the need for a nuanced understanding of memory that takes into account individual variability.

Assessments often rely on standardized tests that may overlook individual differences, particularly in culturally and cognitively diverse populations.

This limitation can lead to skewed results and inadequate diagnoses that fail to address the unique needs of these groups.

By incorporating subjectivity and context into experimental designs, researchers can create more accurate diagnostic tools and personalized interventions. This could lead to more effective treatments for memory-related impairments such as dementia and cognitive decline.

Why we remember certain experiences

The review also stresses how memory influences decision-making, particularly through the “why” of memory retention.

Memorable experiences often serve as cognitive reference points that guide individuals when they encounter similar situations.

For example, emotionally significant memories can shape decision-making in areas such as relationships, professional settings, and even high-stakes scenarios like healthcare choices.

The researchers suggest that understanding these connections can lead to practical applications, such as improving decision-making frameworks or designing targeted interventions that help individuals make more informed choices based on their unique patterns of recall.

Emerging technologies to study human cognition

Advancements in neuroscience and technology are providing researchers with new tools to study human recall.

Techniques like functional MRI (fMRI) and machine learning are helping visualize how memories are encoded, stored, and retrieved.

These tools are enabling researchers to identify patterns in memory retention and recall with unprecedented precision.

The integration of these technologies into studies of human cognition could lead to significant advancements in diagnosing and treating conditions such as Alzheimer’s disease.

Additionally, personalized cognitive training programs that leverage these insights could enhance retention strategies, particularly for aging populations or individuals with cognitive challenges.

The full study was published in the journal Cognitive Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–

News coming your way
The biggest news about our planet delivered to you each day
Subscribe