Can we trust our memories? Separating truth from fiction

How much can we trust our memories? In a fascinating new study, researchers explored this question and found that we have a commendable awareness of the accuracy of our recollections.

When our mind romantically stitches together our past with a blend of true occurrences and general knowledge, we seem to have an innate understanding of which parts to trust and which ones are mere fillers.

Intriguing blend of truth and fiction

Scientists from the University of Birmingham embarked on a journey to investigate the intriguing nature of our memories.

They found that when generic information seems more pronounced, our confidence in the memory wavers, suggesting that we can distinguish between these two types of memory.

Memories are a blend of recalled details and ‘prototypical’ information, but the study has shown that when prototypes appear more prominent, we become less confident in the recollection.

Understanding ‘prototypical’ memories

Prototypical memories are like snapshots in our minds. Imagine remembering your last birthday party. Your brain blends details from many birthday parties you’ve had.

This mix forms a typical birthday memory. It helps you know what to expect at future parties.

These memories help us make sense of new things. When you see a new type of dog, you compare it to the typical dog in your memory. This helps you recognize it as a dog.

Our brains use these blended memories to learn and understand the world around us. They make it easier to remember and organize our experiences. It’s like having a mental guidebook that helps us navigate life.

Memory’s reliance on prototypes

This intriguing mechanism of our brain helps us to streamline our memories, especially when it comes to recurring events.

For instance, we rely on our memory vividly when recalling a unique event, like a birthday dinner.

Conversely, our daily commute to work is a recurrent event, and our brain only retains unique elements, such as an unexpected detour or a near accident, while filling in the rest from our stored general knowledge.

“Events that occur regularly, such as your commute to work, are streamlined by the brain to only retain the unique elements – some roadworks, perhaps, or a near-miss,” explains Dr. Ben Griffiths, the lead author. “The rest of the details are filled in from pre-existing knowledge.

Shining light on prototype dominance

Over 200 participants were involved in a series of experiments to test this theory. They were presented with objects in unusual colors, like a blue apple, and after a simple distraction, they were asked to recall and identify the specific shade of the object. Following that, they were asked to rate their confidence in their answer.

The researchers applied unsupervised machine learning techniques to analyze the responses, which helped them identify the prototypical shades people opted for when they were unsure of their recollection’s accuracy.

Mindful of memory gaps and trust

Interestingly, the researchers found that participants’ confidence in their color selections decreased when the colors resembled the prototypical shades identified by the machine learning model.

This indicates that we are aware of the extent to which we allow prototypes to fill in gaps in our memory and make conscious adjustments when assessing our memory’s accuracy.

Implications of trusting memories

The implications of this study reach beyond our personal internal workings and have significant impact on areas like legal cases, where accurate eyewitness recollection plays a crucial role.

The accuracy of the recollection and the confidence the individual has in their memory could be key in making life-changing decisions.

“Our research shows that people are actually quite good at knowing when their accounts are reliable and when they are influenced by their brain filling in gaps with generic information,” Dr. Griffiths added.

We seem to inherently know when our memories are genuine and when they’re filled with general knowledge, making this an intriguing aspect of the human psyche.

The full study was published in the journal Communications Psychology.

—–

Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates. 

Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.

—–