Every living being has a unique way of dealing with adversity. Amid the length and breadth of fauna, bats have always stunned us with their exceptional navigational skills, largely attributable to their acute sense of hearing. But what happens when these creatures lose their most critical sense – can they still find their way in the dark?
New research from The Johns Hopkins University breaks fresh ground in this area, revealing that bats, in fact, do switch to a backup plan when their hearing takes a hit.
This extraordinary discovery broadens our understanding of the adaptability of the brain in the face of sensory deprivation. But, is this ability exclusive to bats, or could it be lurking in other animals or even us humans?
Picture a scenario where echolocating bats, who rely heavily on hearing, face a sudden shutdown of a key auditory region in their brain.
One would anticipate some serious navigational glitches. Not really, as the research team at Johns Hopkins found out.
We’ve seen animals and humans alike adapt to sensory deprivation. Amid the clamor of a crowded bar, you might lean closer to a friend to hear them better. Your pet might cock its head to catch a faint rustling.
The question here is – how does an echolocating bat, for whom hearing is a lifeline, cope with such a loss?
To explore this, the researchers designed a unique experiment. The bats were trained to fly down a corridor and through a window to fetch a treat from a platform.
Next, the same task was repeated, but with a twist. A critical auditory pathway in the bats’ midbrain was temporarily blocked, an effect equivalent to most auditory signals from reaching the brain’s deep regions.
The results are nothing short of surprising. Despite their compromised hearing, the bats were able to navigate the course quite impressively, right from the first attempt.
No, they weren’t as sleek as before and did bump into things. But what mattered was that every bat adapted instantly.
“Bats have this amazing flexible adaptive behavior that they can employ anytime,” said study senior author Cynthia F. Moss, a Johns Hopkins neuroscientist who studies bats.
The bats chose to fly lower, aligned themselves along walls, and made more frequent and lengthier calls. This amplification of echo signals compensated for their navigation.
“Echolocation acts like strobes, so they were basically taking more snapshots to help them get the missing information,” said study co-author Clarice A. Diebold, a former Johns Hopkins graduate student who is now a postdoctoral student at Washington University in St. Louis.
Interestingly, these adaptations are usually observed when bats counteract external noise, but in this case, the sound processing deficit was internal.
Despite repeated experiments, the bats’ compensation skills didn’t refine further, implying these weren’t learned behaviors. The adaptations were innate, hardwired into their brain circuits.
The research team was taken aback by the bats’ residual hearing, despite a disabled auditory region. Moss theorizes that bats could be leveraging an unidentified auditory pathway or that unaffected neurons could be aiding hearing in ways unknown.
This remarkable adaptability raises questions about the role of other senses in bats’ navigational prowess. Bats are known to possess highly sensitive tactile receptors on their wings, enabling them to gather environmental information through subtle air currents.
These tactile cues may offer supplementary, albeit less precise, spatial information when auditory guidance falters. Furthermore, olfactory and visual inputs could contribute to forming a cohesive map of their surroundings, providing a multi-sensory approach to navigation.
Understanding how bats integrate these various sensory inputs enriches our knowledge of their survival strategies and sheds light on the remarkable plasticity of neural pathways in response to sensory impairments.
The findings from this study offer novel insights that could influence approaches in human sensory rehabilitation.
Drawing parallels between bats’ innate adaptation to auditory deficits and human attempts to cope with sensory loss opens avenues for developing more effective prosthetic devices or training protocols.
Just as bats utilize a combination of residual hearing and other sensory inputs, humans can potentially harness multi-sensory strategies to compensate for deficits, enhancing quality of life.
The research invites further exploration into the brain’s capacity for adaptation and may ultimately lead to groundbreaking advancements in sensory repair and augmentation technologies.
This study doesn’t just highlight how bats navigate through a hearing crisis, but also nudges us to ponder – could this phenomenon hold true for other creatures or even humans?
“You’d think an animal wouldn’t be able to hear at all,” Moss said. “But it suggests that there might be multiple pathways for sound to travel to the auditory cortex.”
Although it’s a path less tread, the insights we could gain about auditory processing and adaptive responses in humans could be monumental. It’s a thrilling prospect, one that could potentially revolutionize the way we perceive and address sensory deficits in the future.
The study is published in the journal Current Biology.
—–
Like what you read? Subscribe to our newsletter for engaging articles, exclusive content, and the latest updates.
Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.
—–