In the remote, frigid world of Antarctica, a unique group of lifeforms persists in spite of the harsh conditions, with land temperatures averaging around -60°C and ocean temperatures near the freezing point of saltwater (-1.9°C).
One such example is the Antarctic icefishes (Cryonotothenioidea), which have evolved extraordinary adaptations to thrive in the icy waters surrounding the continent. Among these adaptations are special “antifreeze” glycoproteins, which prevent ice formation within their cells, the absence of hemoglobin in some species, and the loss of the inducible heat shock response, which is nearly universal in other organisms.
A recent study published in the journal Molecular Biology and Evolution has uncovered the genetic mechanisms responsible for the adaptation of Antarctic icefishes’ visual systems to both extreme cold and the unique lighting conditions found under Antarctic sea ice.
The study, led by Gianni Castiglione (now at Vanderbilt University) and Belinda Chang (University of Toronto), focused on the impact of sub-zero temperatures on the function and evolution of icefishes’ visual systems, particularly the temperature-sensitive protein rhodopsin, which plays a role in vision under dim-light conditions.
Castiglione and Chang’s previous research had already suggested a key role for rhodopsin in cold adaptation. “We had previously found cold adaptation in the rhodopsins of high-altitude catfishes from the Andes mountains, and this spurred us into investigating cold adaptation in rhodopsins from the Antarctic icefishes,” said Castiglione.
In their study, the researchers found evidence of positive selection and accelerated rates of evolution in rhodopsins among Antarctic icefishes.
They also identified two amino acid variants, absent from other vertebrates, that appeared to have evolved during two key periods in icefish history: the development of antifreeze glycoproteins and the onset of freezing polar conditions.
This timing suggests a strong association between these variants and the adaptation and speciation of icefish in response to climatic events.
To verify the functional effects of these amino acid variants, the team performed in vitro assays, creating versions of rhodopsin containing each variant. Both amino acid changes impacted rhodopsin’s kinetic profile, lowering the activation energy needed for the protein to return to a “dark” conformation, and likely compensating for cold-induced decreases in rhodopsin’s kinetic rate.
Additionally, one amino acid change led to a shift in rhodopsin’s light absorbance toward longer wavelengths. This simultaneous alteration of both kinetics and absorbance was unexpected, according to Castiglione, who noted, “We predict that this allows the icefish to adapt their vision to red-shifted wavelengths under sea ice and to cold temperatures through very few mutations.”
Interestingly, the amino acid changes seen in Antarctic icefishes differed from those responsible for cold adaptation in high-altitude catfishes, suggesting multiple pathways for adaptation in rhodopsin. To further explore this line of inquiry, the researchers aim to study cold adaptation in rhodopsins of other cold-dwelling fish lineages, including Arctic fishes.
“Arctic fishes share many of the cold-adapted phenotypes found in the Antarctic icefishes, such as antifreeze proteins. However, this convergent evolution appears to have been accomplished through divergent molecular mechanisms. We suspect this may be the case in rhodopsin as well,” said Castiglione.
Unfortunately, acquiring the data needed may prove difficult. “A major obstacle to our research is the difficulty of collecting fishes from Antarctic and Arctic waters,” says Castiglione, “which limits us to publicly available datasets.”
This task may become even more challenging in the future as these cold-adapted fish are increasingly affected by warming global temperatures.
According to Castiglione, “Climate change may alter the adaptive landscape of icefishes in the very near future, as sea ice continues to melt, forcing the icefish to very likely find themselves at an evolutionary ‘mismatch’ between their environment and their genetics.”
In addition to Antarctic icefishes, Antarctica hosts a variety of other unique creatures that have adapted to its extreme conditions. Some of these species include:
These are just a few examples of the diverse life found in Antarctica, where many species have evolved unique adaptations to survive the extreme conditions.
Climate change is having significant impacts on Antarctica and its surrounding ecosystems. Some of the most notable effects include:
Overall, climate change poses significant threats to Antarctica’s unique ecosystems and the species that call it home. The impacts of climate change on Antarctica can also have global consequences, such as contributing to sea-level rise and altering ocean circulation patterns.
—-
Check us out on EarthSnap, a free app brought to you by Eric Ralls and Earth.com.